Ask the expert
Do you have a question about how biodiversity can be better prioritised in decisions?
Ask us
Just fill out the form below and click to Submit. Before make sure you read our privacy policy and how we treat your personal data.
Questions and Answers
Learning Communities – linking to the intensive cases – help co-design the research process and reflect on the usefulness of the tested methods together with local stakeholders (e.g. urban youth, minority communities).
Read more about how we work with them.
The sector-based extensive cases are supported by stakeholder boards (including experts and stakeholders from the given sectors, e.g fashion industry or trade), which are regularly consulted to ask for their feedback and benefit from their outreach and upscaling potential.
Read more about how we work with them.
PLANET4B is centred around the development and application of three complimentary sets of research intervention methods explored within 11 case studies.
Experiential learning games
Three games: a cooperative Biodiversity Food Governance board game, a Biodiversity Negotiation role-playing game, a biodiversity adaptation of falling blocks game; Jenga®, are at various stages of development and testing.
Attention, framing, nudging and social norms relevant techniques
While discussed throughout the project, to date, few cases apply these as primary interventions, although there are plans to use a choice-architecture experiment in Germany (putting different paper inlays in shopping trolleys to see if this triggers more sustainable shopping choices). Systematic behaviour observations proposed in Norway may also fall in this category.
Deliberative, creative and arts-based methods
9 out of 11 cases have chosen to include deliberative, creative and arts-based methods in their approach, and often multiple within each case study (including photo-exhibition, storytelling, workshops, drama, filmmaking, excursions, and many others).
For more information read the full report.
Intersectionality plays a crucial role in tackling the intertwining issues of inequalities and biodiversity loss. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics among various social categories and their effects on biodiversity.
The co-creation process facilitated by PLANET4B consortium has led to the development of a robust intersectional framework for future biodiversity case studies. This framework constitutes a significant step forward for intersectionality-based research and practice in biodiversity conservation.
Embracing intersectionality can challenge conventional notions of objectivity and distance in research, and pave the way for the creation of more inclusive and equitable biodiversity policies.
Read our analysis on methodologocal framework of intersectionality.
The document Directory of Key Intervention Methods provides a unique collection of 100 different methods for improving biodiversity decision-making.
The technique was tested in the project workshop.
Read more about our experiences:
Visit the sub-page of partners on our website and check out our youtube channel, where you can also watch interviews with our experts.
Policy recommendations will be developed in the mature phase of the project based on the project’s scientific research. They will be published and disseminated in 2025.
Questions and Answers
Policy recommendations will be developed in the mature phase of the project based on the project’s scientific research. They will be published and disseminated in 2025.
Visit the sub-page of partners on our website and check out our youtube channel, where you can also watch interviews with our experts.
The technique was tested in the project workshop.
Read more about our experiences:
The document Directory of Key Intervention Methods provides a unique collection of 100 different methods for improving biodiversity decision-making.
Intersectionality plays a crucial role in tackling the intertwining issues of inequalities and biodiversity loss. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics among various social categories and their effects on biodiversity.
The co-creation process facilitated by PLANET4B consortium has led to the development of a robust intersectional framework for future biodiversity case studies. This framework constitutes a significant step forward for intersectionality-based research and practice in biodiversity conservation.
Embracing intersectionality can challenge conventional notions of objectivity and distance in research, and pave the way for the creation of more inclusive and equitable biodiversity policies.
Read our analysis on methodologocal framework of intersectionality.
PLANET4B is centred around the development and application of three complimentary sets of research intervention methods explored within 11 case studies.
Experiential learning games
Three games: a cooperative Biodiversity Food Governance board game, a Biodiversity Negotiation role-playing game, a biodiversity adaptation of falling blocks game; Jenga®, are at various stages of development and testing.
Attention, framing, nudging and social norms relevant techniques
While discussed throughout the project, to date, few cases apply these as primary interventions, although there are plans to use a choice-architecture experiment in Germany (putting different paper inlays in shopping trolleys to see if this triggers more sustainable shopping choices). Systematic behaviour observations proposed in Norway may also fall in this category.
Deliberative, creative and arts-based methods
9 out of 11 cases have chosen to include deliberative, creative and arts-based methods in their approach, and often multiple within each case study (including photo-exhibition, storytelling, workshops, drama, filmmaking, excursions, and many others).
For more information read the full report.
The sector-based extensive cases are supported by stakeholder boards (including experts and stakeholders from the given sectors, e.g fashion industry or trade), which are regularly consulted to ask for their feedback and benefit from their outreach and upscaling potential.
Read more about how we work with them.
Learning Communities – linking to the intensive cases – help co-design the research process and reflect on the usefulness of the tested methods together with local stakeholders (e.g. urban youth, minority communities).
Read more about how we work with them.
