The document summarises the results of the workshop on ‘theory of commonalities and conflicts’. The report provides a methodological description of the two-day workshop, where participants analysed the case studies of the project, using creative methods and an interactive approach. Which areas connecting strongly to biodiversity are covered in the case studies? What sort of creative methods did the participants used so far to develop each case study? Which theories [...]

Read about our latest analysis 'Directory of key methods most suitable for biodiversity decision-making contexts' in brief which presents a unique collection of 100 different methods for improving biodiversity decision-making and a new Reflexivity-Contextualisation Matrix.  

Short summary of the Report on biodiversity and related concepts perceptions. Download the corresponding presentation.  

PLANET4B partners, including both researchers and practitioners, made an inventory of theories potentially applicable for influencing decisionmaking relevant to biodiversity.  Read about it in nutshell.

This report introduces a directory of 100 key intervention methods most suitable for biodiversity decision making contexts, organised across three main categories: experiential games; framing and nudging experiments; and creative, arts-based and deliberative methods.  

To tackle this interlinkage of inequalities in the field of biodiversity, PLANET4B aims at utilizing the concept of intersectionality. Intersectionality highlights that race, gender, disability, sexuality, class, age, and other social categories are interrelated and lead to different levels of power and oppression influenced by forces like colonialism and neoliberalism.